|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have authored MSI installer with VS9 Setup and Deployment project.
My MSI includes Install and Uninstall custom actions. This MSI always gets deployed with /PASSIVE passed in. My problem is that install custom actions don't always get executed when running the MSI for the second time (running the MSI after it had already been installed). Whether install CAs get executed or not seems to be affected by /PASSIVE parameter passed at command line. I am looking at these two scenarios: Scenario #1: Run the MSI for the second time by double clicking the MSI. Repair/ Remove dialog comes up. Selecting Repair (which happens to be default button) will result in install CAs execution, as desired. Scenario #2: Run the MSI for the second time but this time from the command line: msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE In this scenario my install custom actions are NOT executed. I would like to change this behavior. I should mention that install CAs do run OK when executing the MSI for the second time from the command line without /PASSIVE parameter: msiexec /I Something.MSI I have tried tried changing Condition for my Install CA (to force CA's to run no matter what) to: NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode="Repair" (Install CA still didn't run in scenario #2) NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode="Modify" (Install CA still didn't run in scenario #2) NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Repair? (this causes runtime error) NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Modify? (this causes runtime error) I should probably also mention that my MSI has these settings: DetectNewerInstalledVersion=True RemovePreviousVersions=True Any help will be greatly appreciated! |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sep 14, 5:39*pm, livingstone <livingstone_a...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have authored MSI installer with VS9 Setup and Deployment project. > My MSI includes Install and Uninstall custom actions. This MSI always > gets deployed with /PASSIVE passed in. > > My problem is that install custom actions don't always get executed > when running the MSI for the second time (running the MSI after it had > already been installed). Whether install CAs get executed or not seems > to be affected by /PASSIVE parameter passed at command line. I am > looking at these two scenarios: > > Scenario #1: > Run the MSI for the second time by double clicking the MSI. Repair/ > Remove dialog comes up. Selecting Repair (which happens to be default > button) will result in install CAs execution, as desired. > > Scenario #2: > Run the MSI for the second time but this time from the command line: > * * * * msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > In this scenario my install custom actions are NOT executed. I would > like to change this behavior. > > I should mention that install CAs do run OK when executing the MSI for > the second time from the command line without /PASSIVE parameter: > * * * * msiexec /I Something.MSI > > I have tried tried changing Condition for my Install CA (to force CA's > to run no matter what) to: > > NOT Installed OR Installed OR > MaintenanceMode="Repair" * * * * (Install CA still didn't run in > scenario #2) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR > MaintenanceMode="Modify" * * * * (Install CA still didn't run in > scenario #2) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Repair? * * * *(this > causes runtime error) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Modify? * * * *(this > causes runtime error) > > I should probably also mention that my MSI has these settings: > DetectNewerInstalledVersion=True > RemovePreviousVersions=True > > Any help will be greatly appreciated! Hi, The problem you have is that in scenario one you're using the UI to put the MSI into maintenance/repair mode. In scenario two you're effectively trying to install a product that is already installed. This won't just not run the CAs, it won't actually do anything. The question I would have is, why are you trying to install the application passively over the top of an existing install? Are you trying to repair? If so you should run the following command line: msiexec /f <path to msi> /passive If you want to ensure that the Install CAs run no matter what (presumably during repair as well?), you should condition them using REMOVE<>"ALL". This covers off every scenario except uninstall. Hope this helps. Cheers, Loz |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As pointed out, you cannot install the same product twice, as identified by
the ProductCode guid. That product is already installed, and Visual Studio's default maintenance mode action is to Repair. So your custom actions won't run. -- Phil Wilson The Definitive Guide to Windows Installer http://www.apress.com/book/view/1590592972 "livingstone" <livingstone_anna@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c9093e6e-dddc-4859-9d78-55652c9dad7b@g6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... >I have authored MSI installer with VS9 Setup and Deployment project. > My MSI includes Install and Uninstall custom actions. This MSI always > gets deployed with /PASSIVE passed in. > > My problem is that install custom actions don't always get executed > when running the MSI for the second time (running the MSI after it had > already been installed). Whether install CAs get executed or not seems > to be affected by /PASSIVE parameter passed at command line. I am > looking at these two scenarios: > > Scenario #1: > Run the MSI for the second time by double clicking the MSI. Repair/ > Remove dialog comes up. Selecting Repair (which happens to be default > button) will result in install CAs execution, as desired. > > Scenario #2: > Run the MSI for the second time but this time from the command line: > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > In this scenario my install custom actions are NOT executed. I would > like to change this behavior. > > I should mention that install CAs do run OK when executing the MSI for > the second time from the command line without /PASSIVE parameter: > msiexec /I Something.MSI > > I have tried tried changing Condition for my Install CA (to force CA's > to run no matter what) to: > > NOT Installed OR Installed OR > MaintenanceMode="Repair" (Install CA still didn't run in > scenario #2) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR > MaintenanceMode="Modify" (Install CA still didn't run in > scenario #2) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Repair? (this > causes runtime error) > NOT Installed OR Installed OR MaintenanceMode=?Modify? (this > causes runtime error) > > I should probably also mention that my MSI has these settings: > DetectNewerInstalledVersion=True > RemovePreviousVersions=True > > Any help will be greatly appreciated! |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LoZ, Phil, thanks a million for your time and input. I am "not quite
there yet". Maybe (most likely) because I don't fully understand / PASSIVE option and/or difference between running MSI from the command line vs. interactively-by double clicking the MSI. My understanding (and I might be wrong) is that /PASSIVE literally takes all default options to avoid having the user interact. If REPAIR is the default option when running the MSI by double clicking it for the second time why wouldn't the II run of the msi from the command line take supposed default option of REPAIR and actually run custom actions as well? Also, the second consecutive run of the MSI from the command line msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE will actually DO SOMETHING so to some extent I have to disagree with LoZ that >> "This won't just not run the CAs, it won't actually do anything. " If any of the files installed by the first run of the MSI get deleted (by mistake, for example), running the MSI on top of itself in Scenario #2 will actually reinstall the missing files - isn't this a sort of repair? Maybe I should I ask the question like this: how can I make sure that CAs will execute on the II consecutive run of msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE LoZ, I tried your suggestion to set condition on my custom actions to REMOVE<>"ALL" and it didn't help - CAs still don't run in Scenario #2 outlined in my first post. To answer LoZ's question - the reason I am even trying to test running MSI on top of itself msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE is to have a full understanding of what it does, if anything, in case my customer ends up doing it. My customer always runs with /PASSIVE because they push my MSI via SMS at night and the requirement is that no user interaction is permitted (MSI is sort of silent, userinput- less install). I needed to know what happens, if anything, if the customer pushes the same MSI by mistake two times in a row. Now that I discovered what it does I am trying to make the second run of the msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE do the exact same thing that the first run did. Maybe I am chasing my tail? Thanks again folks. Cheers, livingstone |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sep 14, 11:17*pm, livingstone <livingstone_a...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> LoZ, Phil, thanks a million for your time and input. I am "not quite > there yet". Maybe (most likely) because I don't fully understand / > PASSIVE option and/or difference between running MSI from the command > line vs. interactively-by double clicking the MSI. My understanding > (and I might be wrong) is that /PASSIVE literally takes all default > options to avoid having the user interact. If REPAIR is the default > option when running the MSI by double clicking it for the second time > why wouldn't the II run of the msi from the command line take supposed > default option of REPAIR and actually run custom actions as well? > > Also, the second consecutive run of the MSI from the command line > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > will actually DO SOMETHING so to some extent I have to disagree with > LoZ that>> "This won't just not run the CAs, it won't actually do anything. " > > If any of the files installed by the first run of the MSI get deleted > (by mistake, for example), running the MSI on top of itself in > Scenario #2 will actually reinstall the missing files - isn't this a > sort of repair? > > Maybe I should I ask the question like this: how can I make sure that > CAs will execute on the II consecutive run of > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > LoZ, I tried your suggestion to set condition on my custom actions to > REMOVE<>"ALL" and it didn't help - CAs still don't run in Scenario #2 > outlined in my first post. > > To answer LoZ's question - the reason I am even trying to test running > MSI on top of itself > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > is to have a full understanding of what it does, if anything, in case > my customer ends up doing it. My customer always runs with /PASSIVE > because they push my MSI via SMS at night and the requirement is that > no user interaction is permitted (MSI is sort of silent, userinput- > less install). I needed to know what happens, if anything, if the > customer pushes the same MSI by mistake two times in a row. Now that I > discovered what it does I am trying to make the second run of the > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > do the exact same thing that the first run did. Maybe I *am chasing my > tail? > > Thanks again folks. > Cheers, > livingstone Hi livingstone, The behaviour you see during a second installation (msiexec.exe /i) is entirely by design. The thing to bear in mind is that Windows Installer is aware that the product you are installing has already been installed and registered on the machine. In UI mode (/passive not used) Windows Installer offers the user the chance to say "whoops, wrong command line" and choose to repair or modify (REINSTALL property gets set) instead. In non- or basic-UI modes (/passive, /quiet) Windows Installer just sees that the product is registered and effectively does nothing. This is expected behaviour. It's being run non-interactively so there is no user sitting there to tell it what they ACTUALLY meant to do. I work for a big company using SCCM to deploy MSIs and can assure you that this is the behaviour that I see when an advertisement is re-run on a machine. It fires the same command line (msiexec.exe /i <msi path> /quiet) and Windows Installer kicks in to handle checking whether the product is already installed. I may not have communicated it very well but I was not expecting that conditioning a CA using REMOVE<>"ALL" would run under your scenario #2. But it is exactly the condition you would use to ensure that the CA fired in every valid execution mode (install, repair/reinstall) and not when the product was being uninstalled. Hope this clears it up a bit. Cheers, Loz |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Forget passive for a moment. Install the MSI file. After it's installed,
try to install it again. You'll see a maint dialog as LoZ mentioned. The default is Repair. It does not install it "again", whatever that might be thought to mean. When you run without showing UI all that happens is that it takes that default and does the repair. It's not even looking at your MSI file, it's using the cached one in Windows\Installer. -- Phil Wilson The Definitive Guide to Windows Installer http://www.apress.com/book/view/1590592972 "livingstone" <livingstone_anna@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:80ab6618-1fc3-484e-a1d6-944b8806e8e6@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > LoZ, Phil, thanks a million for your time and input. I am "not quite > there yet". Maybe (most likely) because I don't fully understand / > PASSIVE option and/or difference between running MSI from the command > line vs. interactively-by double clicking the MSI. My understanding > (and I might be wrong) is that /PASSIVE literally takes all default > options to avoid having the user interact. If REPAIR is the default > option when running the MSI by double clicking it for the second time > why wouldn't the II run of the msi from the command line take supposed > default option of REPAIR and actually run custom actions as well? > > Also, the second consecutive run of the MSI from the command line > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > will actually DO SOMETHING so to some extent I have to disagree with > LoZ that >>> "This won't just not run the CAs, it won't actually do anything. " > If any of the files installed by the first run of the MSI get deleted > (by mistake, for example), running the MSI on top of itself in > Scenario #2 will actually reinstall the missing files - isn't this a > sort of repair? > > > Maybe I should I ask the question like this: how can I make sure that > CAs will execute on the II consecutive run of > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > LoZ, I tried your suggestion to set condition on my custom actions to > REMOVE<>"ALL" and it didn't help - CAs still don't run in Scenario #2 > outlined in my first post. > > To answer LoZ's question - the reason I am even trying to test running > MSI on top of itself > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > is to have a full understanding of what it does, if anything, in case > my customer ends up doing it. My customer always runs with /PASSIVE > because they push my MSI via SMS at night and the requirement is that > no user interaction is permitted (MSI is sort of silent, userinput- > less install). I needed to know what happens, if anything, if the > customer pushes the same MSI by mistake two times in a row. Now that I > discovered what it does I am trying to make the second run of the > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > do the exact same thing that the first run did. Maybe I am chasing my > tail? > > Thanks again folks. > Cheers, > livingstone |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks again for your thoughts and time LoZ and Phil ...
I agree that cashed version of the MSI will be used the second time around. I am good with that in all of my scenarios because cashed MSI is IDENTICAL to the MSI running II time around. I think our our conversation might be coming down to what REPAIR really means. The way I see it REPAIR consists of: A - "replenishing" of any missing files (target files manually deleted after the first/clean install) and B - firing of custom actions When running with UI and selecting REPAIR explicitly, both A and B happen (I see this as a full repair) When running from the command line with /I, both A and B happen (I see this as a full repair) When running from the command line with /I /PASSIVE, only A happens (I see this as a partial repair). |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sep 16, 4:30*pm, livingstone <livingstone_a...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks again for your thoughts and time LoZ and Phil ... > > I agree that cashed version of the MSI will be used the second time > around. I am good with that in all of my scenarios because cashed MSI > is IDENTICAL to the MSI running II time around. I think our our > conversation might be coming down to what REPAIR really means. The way > I see it REPAIR consists of: > > A - "replenishing" of any missing files (target files manually deleted > after the first/clean install) and > B - firing of custom actions > > When running with UI and selecting REPAIR explicitly, both A and B > happen (I see this as a full repair) > When running from the command line with /I, both A and B happen (I see > this as a full repair) > When running from the command line with /I /PASSIVE, only A happens (I > see this as a partial repair). I was with you up until you said that running from the command line with /I /passive when the app is already installed puts the missing files back down. This does not happen in my experience. Running an advertised shortcut belonging to the app will "self heal" as long as the missing files are keypaths for components. Broadly speaking. A lot of what you need to know is held in the logs. Windows Installer does a great job of logging loads more information than you could possibly need if you tell it to. At the command line I think the most verbose option is to tag "/l*xv <path to log>" at the end. |
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sep 15, 5:33*pm, "Wilson, Phil" <ph...@wonderware.nospam.com>
wrote: > Forget passive for a moment. Install the MSI file. *After it's installed, > try to install it again. You'll see a maint dialog as LoZ mentioned. The > default is Repair. It does not install it "again", whatever that might be > thought to mean. When you run without showing UI all that happens is thatit > takes that default and does the repair. It's not even looking at your MSI > file, it's using the cached one in *Windows\Installer. > > -- > Phil Wilson > The Definitive Guide to Windows Installerhttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1590592972 > > "livingstone" <livingstone_a...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:80ab6618-1fc3-484e-a1d6-944b8806e8e6@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > > > LoZ, Phil, thanks a million for your time and input. I am "not quite > > there yet". Maybe (most likely) because I don't fully understand / > > PASSIVE option and/or difference between running MSI from the command > > line vs. interactively-by double clicking the MSI. My understanding > > (and I might be wrong) is that /PASSIVE literally takes all default > > options to avoid having the user interact. If REPAIR is the default > > option when running the MSI by double clicking it for the second time > > why wouldn't the II run of the msi from the command line take supposed > > default option of REPAIR and actually run custom actions as well? > > > Also, the second consecutive run of the MSI from the command line > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > will actually DO SOMETHING so to some extent I have to disagree with > > LoZ that > >>> "This won't just not run the CAs, it won't actually do anything. " > > If any of the files installed by the first run of the MSI get deleted > > (by mistake, for example), running the MSI on top of itself in > > Scenario #2 will actually reinstall the missing files - isn't this a > > sort of repair? > > > Maybe I should I ask the question like this: how can I make sure that > > CAs will execute on the II consecutive run of > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > LoZ, I tried your suggestion to set condition on my custom actions to > > REMOVE<>"ALL" and it didn't help - CAs still don't run in Scenario #2 > > outlined in my first post. > > > To answer LoZ's question - the reason I am even trying to test running > > MSI on top of itself > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > is to have a full understanding of what it does, if anything, in case > > my customer ends up doing it. My customer always runs with /PASSIVE > > because they push my MSI via SMS at night and the requirement is that > > no user interaction is permitted (MSI is sort of silent, userinput- > > less install). I needed to know what happens, if anything, if the > > customer pushes the same MSI by mistake two times in a row. Now that I > > discovered what it does I am trying to make the second run of the > > msiexec /I Something.MSI /PASSIVE > > do the exact same thing that the first run did. Maybe I *am chasing my > > tail? > > > Thanks again folks. > > Cheers, > > livingstone That's not my understanding at all Phil. In my experience even if the default option offered by the UI window is repair, using /passive with /i will not do anything at all the second time round. Windows Installer will not switch into maintenance mode automatically, it will just see that the product is registered and stop the install. It will reference the cached MSI as you say but will not repair it if / i has been passed in the command line. Which would explain why in livingstone's scenario #2 described above, the custom action(s) do not fire again. Anyway, I could be completely wrong on this but my experiences suggest otherwise. |
|