|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical
servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? I’m thinking the latter due to the following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, “System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available”. I’m sure the client doesn’t want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs. Thanks in advance for any feedback. Raymond |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
rjskelton wrote:
> I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical > servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V > Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? Im thinking the latter due to the > following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, System Center Virtual > Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 > R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available. > Im sure the client doesnt want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs. > Thanks in advance for any feedback. > Raymond I haven't gotten around to using Hyper-V yet. However, after doing some initial reading, it became apparent that the GUI is stripped away and you just get a command-line interface. If you're comfortable with the old DOS days of working in console mode with some apps providing their own standards on their UIs then Hyper-V is for you. It's a hell of a lot cheaper since it is free (I don't recall the limitations regarding business versus development versus personal use). I figure if the customer wants a server version of Windows then it's likely they want the desktop and the GUI that they are used to. |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There's a free downloadable management app to manage single Hyper-V
servers, you don't really need SCVMM for small installations. -- Bob Comer On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:30:59 -0500, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote: >rjskelton wrote: > >> I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical >> servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V >> Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? Im thinking the latter due to the >> following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, System Center Virtual >> Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 >> R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available. >> Im sure the client doesnt want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs. >> Thanks in advance for any feedback. >> Raymond > >I haven't gotten around to using Hyper-V yet. However, after doing some >initial reading, it became apparent that the GUI is stripped away and >you just get a command-line interface. If you're comfortable with the >old DOS days of working in console mode with some apps providing their >own standards on their UIs then Hyper-V is for you. It's a hell of a >lot cheaper since it is free (I don't recall the limitations regarding >business versus development versus personal use). > >I figure if the customer wants a server version of Windows then it's >likely they want the desktop and the GUI that they are used to. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
rjskelton,
I would advise Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V. You do not need systems center to manage a single hyper-v server implementation. It comes in handy when it comes to building templates and dealing with a hyper-v cluster or many virtual machines; but is not required. Keep in mind the hyper-v licensing requirements. Check them out here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...07(WS.10).aspx. Jess "rjskelton" wrote: > I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical > servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V > Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? I’m thinking the latter due to the > following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, “System Center Virtual > Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 > R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available”. > I’m sure the client doesn’t want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs. > Thanks in advance for any feedback. > Raymond > |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|