Go Back   PackageDeploy Application Packaging Forums > Virtualization > Microsoft Virtual Server (Hyper-V)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2010, 09:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
rjskelton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hyper-V server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical
servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V
Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? I’m thinking the latter due to the
following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, “System Center Virtual
Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008
R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available”.
I’m sure the client doesn’t want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Raymond

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 05:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
VanguardLH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hyper-V server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

rjskelton wrote:

> I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical
> servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V
> Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? Im thinking the latter due to the
> following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, System Center Virtual
> Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008
> R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available.
> Im sure the client doesnt want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs.
> Thanks in advance for any feedback.
> Raymond


I haven't gotten around to using Hyper-V yet. However, after doing some
initial reading, it became apparent that the GUI is stripped away and
you just get a command-line interface. If you're comfortable with the
old DOS days of working in console mode with some apps providing their
own standards on their UIs then Hyper-V is for you. It's a hell of a
lot cheaper since it is free (I don't recall the limitations regarding
business versus development versus personal use).

I figure if the customer wants a server version of Windows then it's
likely they want the desktop and the GUI that they are used to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 02:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Matthew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hyper-V server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

I would also recommend investigating vmware's ESXi platform. It's free
and you use a free client app to manage the server.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 04:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Robert Comer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hyper-V server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

There's a free downloadable management app to manage single Hyper-V
servers, you don't really need SCVMM for small installations.

--
Bob Comer



On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:30:59 -0500, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

>rjskelton wrote:
>
>> I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical
>> servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V
>> Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? Im thinking the latter due to the
>> following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, System Center Virtual
>> Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008
>> R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available.
>> Im sure the client doesnt want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs.
>> Thanks in advance for any feedback.
>> Raymond

>
>I haven't gotten around to using Hyper-V yet. However, after doing some
>initial reading, it became apparent that the GUI is stripped away and
>you just get a command-line interface. If you're comfortable with the
>old DOS days of working in console mode with some apps providing their
>own standards on their UIs then Hyper-V is for you. It's a hell of a
>lot cheaper since it is free (I don't recall the limitations regarding
>business versus development versus personal use).
>
>I figure if the customer wants a server version of Windows then it's
>likely they want the desktop and the GUI that they are used to.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 04:02 AM   #5 (permalink)
Jess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Hyper-V server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

rjskelton,

I would advise Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V. You do not need systems
center to manage a single hyper-v server implementation. It comes in handy
when it comes to building templates and dealing with a hyper-v cluster or
many virtual machines; but is not required.

Keep in mind the hyper-v licensing requirements. Check them out here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...07(WS.10).aspx.

Jess

"rjskelton" wrote:

> I have a small business client that wants to consolidate their two physical
> servers to one. The question is what product to use, Microsoft Hyper-V
> Server or Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V? I’m thinking the latter due to the
> following from the FAQs on Hyper-V Server website, “System Center Virtual
> Machine Manager 2008 R2 is required to manage Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008
> R2. It is available today. An eval version of SCVMM is currently available”.
> I’m sure the client doesn’t want to purchase SCVMM to manage two VMs.
> Thanks in advance for any feedback.
> Raymond
>

  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36 PM.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2007 - 2012 PackageDeploy.com