|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I don't have much experience with NLB. A customer of me wants to upgrade from SMS 2003 SP2 to SP3. The design looks like some Primary sites with the default MP and underneath 2 servers with each an assinged MP. My question is what the impact will be for thease assinged MP's when upgrading to SP3? I suppose I only need to install SP3 on the site sytems? Do I need to do something with assigned MP roles regarding the SP upgrade? Some advice would be very appreciated! Thanks Nico |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm not an expert at MPs behind NLBs on SMS2003; I could stumble through in a
pinch. I know of several people who are though, but they hang out more over on the myitforum forums: http://www.myitforum.com/forums/forumid_130/tt.htm Perhaps you could re-post your question over there? The one thing I have heard several times is along the lines of "MPs behind NLBs are annoying because you have to tear down the NLB and rebuild it after every upgrade". I know that statement definitely applied to when upgrading SQL (Service Pack for example). And I suspect it also applied to a SP to SMS2003 itself as well--but I'm not certain. So I encourage you to post on Myitforum and hopefully someone with more in the trenches knowledge will be able to answer definitively. "Nico" wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have much experience with NLB. A customer of me wants to upgrade > from SMS 2003 SP2 to SP3. > > The design looks like some Primary sites with the default MP and underneath > 2 servers with each an assinged MP. > > My question is what the impact will be for thease assinged MP's when > upgrading to SP3? I suppose I only need to install SP3 on the site sytems? > Do I need to do something with assigned MP roles regarding the SP upgrade? > > Some advice would be very appreciated! > > Thanks > > Nico |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Sherry for the tip.
I'll post over there. That is indeed a huge impact! Hope you are mistaken :-) Tnx Nico "Sherry Kissinger [MVP]" wrote: > I'm not an expert at MPs behind NLBs on SMS2003; I could stumble through in a > pinch. I know of several people who are though, but they hang out more over > on the myitforum forums: http://www.myitforum.com/forums/forumid_130/tt.htm > Perhaps you could re-post your question over there? > > The one thing I have heard several times is along the lines of "MPs behind > NLBs are annoying because you have to tear down the NLB and rebuild it after > every upgrade". I know that statement definitely applied to when upgrading > SQL (Service Pack for example). And I suspect it also applied to a SP to > SMS2003 itself as well--but I'm not certain. So I encourage you to post on > Myitforum and hopefully someone with more in the trenches knowledge will be > able to answer definitively. > > "Nico" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't have much experience with NLB. A customer of me wants to upgrade > > from SMS 2003 SP2 to SP3. > > > > The design looks like some Primary sites with the default MP and underneath > > 2 servers with each an assinged MP. > > > > My question is what the impact will be for thease assinged MP's when > > upgrading to SP3? I suppose I only need to install SP3 on the site sytems? > > Do I need to do something with assigned MP roles regarding the SP upgrade? > > > > Some advice would be very appreciated! > > > > Thanks > > > > Nico |
|